kerz
12-22 08:45 PM
Hi,
Do you think the lottery will take place for 2010 year H-1B filing?
Do you think the lottery will take place for 2010 year H-1B filing?
wallpaper Playing: World Of Warcraft
prasadkadam@yahoo.com
08-06 11:01 AM
I have a green card. I have moved to India on 20 Aug 2007. Before going to India I had applied for my re-entry permit (I-131). The re-entry permit is valid from 31 Mar 2008 till 31 Mar 2010.
On 19 Aug 2009 I will be out of US for 2 years, so if I want to maintain my GC status before which date should I come to US and apply for re-entry permit, 20 Aug 2009 (the date of my US departure) or 31 Mar 2010 (expiration date of my travel document)?
On 19 Aug 2009 I will be out of US for 2 years, so if I want to maintain my GC status before which date should I come to US and apply for re-entry permit, 20 Aug 2009 (the date of my US departure) or 31 Mar 2010 (expiration date of my travel document)?
gkdgopi
07-06 01:22 PM
I applied for I140 on January and receipt date is Jan 12 2007, I upgraded to PP during last days of June, and the receipt date for it was July 2nd and today i was checking the status, the status is showing a receipt date of July 5th, i called customer service center they say that receipt date is July 5th and this is not a premium case. I understand that they have temporarily suspended PP for 140, but even though my request for upgrade to PP was rejected, the receipt date should be still Jan 12 2007 or will they change it to latest date when request for PP upgrade was denied, anyone facing this issue?
:mad:
:mad:
2011 master WoW Alliance
bibs
01-16 10:32 AM
I had applied EAD back in 2009.
I received my EAD which was valid from 06/02/2009 to 06/01/2010.
I had applied 485 back in August 6,2007.
So here are the questions:
1) Some of the instruction says, we should not pay for EAD application if we applied on or after 30 July 2007 though I applied in 2009 with application fee of $375.
Should I get back the above filling?
2) Why the EAD was issued for 1 year instead of 2 years for the first time?
3) If I apply now should I file with application fee? Because some instruction says that I donot have to send filing fee as this is a renewal.
4) Can I file electronically?
5) Should I file for EAD to Nebraska office where I filed 485 back in 2007?
Thanks in advance.
I received my EAD which was valid from 06/02/2009 to 06/01/2010.
I had applied 485 back in August 6,2007.
So here are the questions:
1) Some of the instruction says, we should not pay for EAD application if we applied on or after 30 July 2007 though I applied in 2009 with application fee of $375.
Should I get back the above filling?
2) Why the EAD was issued for 1 year instead of 2 years for the first time?
3) If I apply now should I file with application fee? Because some instruction says that I donot have to send filing fee as this is a renewal.
4) Can I file electronically?
5) Should I file for EAD to Nebraska office where I filed 485 back in 2007?
Thanks in advance.
more...
vivache
03-21 06:42 PM
I'm on Eb3 and have my I-140 cleared.
I'm planning to switch jobs .. so I can get on Eb2 and use the priority date of this I 140.
What info do I need to pass to my next company if I want to use this priority date (Filed in July 2002)?
I'm planning to switch jobs .. so I can get on Eb2 and use the priority date of this I 140.
What info do I need to pass to my next company if I want to use this priority date (Filed in July 2002)?
Blog Feeds
09-04 10:30 PM
Let's resume our journey along the road where the arts intersect with America's dysfunctional immigration system. (Previous blog stops en route are posted here and here.) Two weeks ago, USCIS made news when it reportedly held up the approval of a visa petition for America's Got Talent judge, Piers Morgan, thus requiring Larry King to extend his term as CNN evening host until November. Today, we learn from The New York Times that a U.S. consular officer apparently caused the renowned German director Peter Stein to withdraw last July from a major Metropolitan Opera production of Boris Godunov, an operatic...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/09/my-entry.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/09/my-entry.html)
more...
SlowRoasted
05-01 10:12 PM
oooo cool, i like the effect on the dog image too.
2010 World of Warcraft - WoW Gold
kirupa
03-09 09:14 PM
Added!
more...
black_logs
02-02 09:26 AM
Reminder for residents of TX/TN
hair The notebook comes with WoW
inetuser
01-14 11:35 AM
bump
more...
tommui
06-24 09:43 PM
Hi
I jsut wondering which country/place got the strongest prospect for the multimedia industry... Australia/USA/Asia.......??
because I m thinking which places should I go to work if i want to work in this multimedia industry lets say for a couple of years..any suggestion??
(im just a very junior in this industry)
ThANKS
tOM
I jsut wondering which country/place got the strongest prospect for the multimedia industry... Australia/USA/Asia.......??
because I m thinking which places should I go to work if i want to work in this multimedia industry lets say for a couple of years..any suggestion??
(im just a very junior in this industry)
ThANKS
tOM
hot World of Warcraft/Dell Wallpaper (Alliance) by conceptarthouse - CGHUB
NANO3
04-30 01:01 AM
neat design
more...
house lt;Flame Wardengt;(Alliance).
JeffDG
03-30 11:41 AM
I initially voted in favour of this, but on further reflection, I think this is bad policy and urge others to not support this.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
tattoo World of Warcraft
thecuriousguy
04-10 12:37 PM
My wife will be relocating to Toronto,Canada for work and I will be traveling between the US and Canada. My employer is fine with me telecommuting 50% of the time which means I will be working 2 weeks remote and 2 in the USA for the next one year. I will continue to be a US FTE [Software Development] and also pay US taxes. Will I be able to continue being on H1B status while I travel or do I have to explore other visa options? Since I will be returning to the US every 20 days [and by road] will I be able to use the automatic I94 revalidation?
Thanks in Advance!
Thanks in Advance!
more...
pictures New World of Warcraft
Blog Feeds
07-30 03:50 PM
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted today to scrap the controversial REAL ID law which will require states to begin implementing tough new standardized technology requirements for drivers licenses in just a few months. A number of states have rebelled against the requirements and they risk their licenses not being accepted for federal purposes - including boarding airplanes. The measure that passed today is called the PASS ID bill and would extend deadlines and provide more government funds to help in the transition. From Govexec: A Senate panel approved legislation today that would establish federal security standards...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/senate-committee-votes-to-replace-real-id-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/senate-committee-votes-to-replace-real-id-law.html)
dresses World of Warcraft Cataclysm is
kirupa
07-16 10:22 PM
Added :)
more...
makeup work with the Alliance.
jonty_11
06-21 05:23 PM
You will get RFE from USCIS if u have not taken all necessary veccinations.and u will have to take them then...
girlfriend World of Warcraft: Cataclysm -
ilikekilo
05-18 01:12 PM
i believe so, however
this " The new I-94 would have the same date of departure as was in the previous I -94 " i dont know
this " The new I-94 would have the same date of departure as was in the previous I -94 " i dont know
hairstyles cataclysm wow
newwife10
02-09 09:54 AM
Hi,
I was told by my lawyer that I am eligible for the 245i and we are getting the paper work together. Here is my story:
My aunt filed for the i 130 in May 18,1994 for my mum (aunt's sister and her family). It was approved in the same year. While waiting for the priority date I aged out. I was in the US on a F1 visa and went out of status. We consulted many lawyers and the one we retained told me that we can apply for an F1 visa from a i 20 I had got from a school and we filled the paperwork and waited for over a year and half before it was denied. Then the lawyer told me I can apply for AOS through the 245i. We are going to apply for i 130 next month. I am getting ready to pay another retainer to the same lawyer and invest a decade in this process. I would appreciate any information.
Thanks
I was told by my lawyer that I am eligible for the 245i and we are getting the paper work together. Here is my story:
My aunt filed for the i 130 in May 18,1994 for my mum (aunt's sister and her family). It was approved in the same year. While waiting for the priority date I aged out. I was in the US on a F1 visa and went out of status. We consulted many lawyers and the one we retained told me that we can apply for an F1 visa from a i 20 I had got from a school and we filled the paperwork and waited for over a year and half before it was denied. Then the lawyer told me I can apply for AOS through the 245i. We are going to apply for i 130 next month. I am getting ready to pay another retainer to the same lawyer and invest a decade in this process. I would appreciate any information.
Thanks
kelvincoper
01-20 05:50 AM
Hello,
This is my final effect:proud:. I was trying to make something unique, but I dont know how far i m successful to make jelly fish. I was trying to play with the tail of jelly Fish, but time constraint.
Anyhow here is the preview
http://www.funduflash.com/FXpression09_03.html
[source]
cheers
This is my final effect:proud:. I was trying to make something unique, but I dont know how far i m successful to make jelly fish. I was trying to play with the tail of jelly Fish, but time constraint.
Anyhow here is the preview
http://www.funduflash.com/FXpression09_03.html
[source]
cheers
guest1978
07-31 04:15 PM
I filed for my wife's 485 on July 2nd. Assuming USCIS accepts/issues a receipt, how does USCIS decide which case to pick up first, would it be based on RD OR would the case get priority over other cases since the primary applicant has been approved? Any memos, opinions around this?
__________________
------------------------------
EB3 India, PD Jul 2003, NSC
485 RD, Jun 2004
Used AC21 twice, sent letter both times
Filed 485/EAD/AP for spouse: Jul 2, 2007
Self AD: July 23, 2007
------------------------------
__________________
------------------------------
EB3 India, PD Jul 2003, NSC
485 RD, Jun 2004
Used AC21 twice, sent letter both times
Filed 485/EAD/AP for spouse: Jul 2, 2007
Self AD: July 23, 2007
------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment